Autoscaling · Kubernetes ·AWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle CloudKubernetesAny cloud

Autoscaling Kubernetes for the most demanding teams

Eliminate cloud waste.·Boost application performance.·Reduce risk.

SOC 2 Type IIMulti-cloudAI analysisRule-based execution

Trusted by Industry Leaders

Customer stories

Teams running CloudPilot AI at scale.

Teams cut cloud bills, wipe out idle capacity, and hand off the manual tuning and on-call risk to CloudPilot — keeping every dollar working without slowing the business down.

AI inference · GPU · smart home
Netvue

52% lower GPU costs for real-time AI inference

Netvue rebuilt its GPU inference on Kubernetes and moved from GCP to Spot GPUs on AWS — co-locating compute with its data and scaling cleanly through day-and-night traffic swings.

−52%
GPU cost
$180 → $80 per GPU/mo
faster response
compute beside data
Read the story
E-commerce · big data · Spark
Trenz

60% off AWS, with Spark running on Spot

Trenz moved real-time analytics and Spark jobs onto Spot Instances — CloudPilot's 45-minute interruption prediction and same-AZ scheduling held throughput and data accuracy steady.

−60%
EC2 cost
vs. on-demand
45 min
interruption notice
vs. AWS 2 min
Read the story
Generative AI · 3D · EKS
Global GenAI leader

55% lower AWS EKS costs, with zero code changes

A global generative AI leader ran EKS at under 7% CPU utilization. CloudPilot's full-stack autoscaling rightsized workloads in place and reshaped the nodes underneath — halving the bill without a single code change.

−55%
EC2 node cost
~$96K saved per year
resource utilization
no OOM / CPU throttling
Read the story

The problem

You see the waste.
You know the fix.
You have no time.

The teams above started exactly where you are: waste you can see, JVMs that need tuning, Spot you'd run if you trusted it. Three problems every team can name — and can't keep on top of.

01

Waste — easy to see, hard to stay utilized.

75% of cluster CPU sits idle. But reclaiming it takes constant tuning nobody has time for.

02

Tuning — every misconfig becomes an incident.

Heap too small means OOM. Limits too tight mean throttling. Both knowable. Neither gets fixed at scale.

03

Spot — nobody wants to own the risk.

70% off is real. But nobody can predict when it interrupts.

Solution · Workload Autoscaler

Right-size every pod, without restarts.

Workload Autoscaler tunes CPU and memory requests from historical and real-time usage — with safety buffers built in. With in-place pod resizing (K8s 1.33+), it adjusts live pods on the fly, ending both overprovisioning and OOM risk.

  • Smart & safe rightsizingHistorical + real-time metrics, with safety buffers — no guesswork.
  • In-place resizeIn-place resize on K8s 1.33+, no pod restarts.
  • Java-awareTunes JVM heap (-Xmx) and container memory together, GC-risk aware.
  • Autoscaling policyRich autoscaling policies decide when to apply, e.g. only off-peak, or only on Pod recreate.
  • OOM Auto-RemediationDetects OOM kills and auto-boosts memory & JVM heap so Pods stop crashing.
Solution · Node Autoscaler

Fewer nodes, more performance.

Right-sized pods from Workload Autoscaler give Node Autoscaler the exact signal it needs to decide. With deep awareness of your workload patterns and the spot market, it selects the best-fit instance types from 800+ options across zones and families — bin-packing those pods so loose, half-empty nodes collapse into the fewest, cheapest ones.

  • Picks the right instanceBest-fit from 800+ types across zones — spot-aware.
  • Run Spot Like On-DemandPredicts spot kills 45 min ahead — cuts disruptions up to 90%.
  • BinpackSpot + on-demand — fewer, fuller nodes.
Java optimization

Java workloads, finally
right-sized.

JVM heap and container memory are one problem, not two. Most autoscalers only see the container — and leave 40–45% of your Java memory on the table. We optimize both together.

Memory optimization

We resize the JVM heap itself — not just the container.

Container metrics lie — the memory a container reports can’t tell an overprovisioned heap from one about to trigger a Full GC. We read the JVM itself and manage -Xmx directly, coordinated with Pod requests in one loop.

Pod memory
1 · Status quo
Pod request · 8 GiB — billed in full
JVM wall (-Xmx) · 6 GiB
Really used · ~2 GiB

The app reserves 8 GiB, actually uses 2. The other 6 sit idle — billed anyway.

2 · VPA
was 8 GiB
Pod request · 6 GiB
✕ stuck — can’t touch the JVM
Really used · ~2 GiB

They squeeze from the outside and stop dead at the JVM’s 6 GiB. The wall is inside the container.

3 · CloudPilot · JVM-aware
3.5 GiB freed / pod
Pod request · 4.5 GiB
wall moved · -Xmx 3 GiB
Really used · ~2 GiB

① Shrink the JVM first (6 → 3 GiB, GC-aware), ② the request follows (8 → 4.5). The hatched area — down from 8 GiB — returns to the cluster.

Startup boost

Fast starts, lean steady state — no restarts, no waste.

Java startup needs several times more CPU than steady state — size for one and you lose the other. We boost the request at startup, then scale it back in place once the app settles — no restart, no idle waste.

CPU request vs demand · one pod lifecycle

Pod starts with a boosted request — 4 vCPU of headroom for what comes next.

Move through the lifecycle
Resource requestCPU demand
Comparison

The differences are inside the JVM.

Everyone tunes container Requests/Limits. The gaps are inside the JVM — the two capabilities shown above.

Capability
VPA
Vendor A
CloudPilot
Container metric recommendations
JVM heap / GC observability
Direct -Xms / -Xmx management
Heap ↔ GC linked decisions
Automatic ResourceStartupBoost
The deep diveUp to 45% Less Memory, Zero Compromise: Smart Java Workload Optimization on Kubernetes−45%Cluster A memory
352→194 GiB
−40%Cluster B memory
255→154 GiB
Reliability

If our cloud goes down,
your cluster doesn't.

Most optimization vendors run from a centralized control plane. If they go offline, your scaling stops with them. We don't. The agent that does the work lives in your cluster.

↳ Worst case scenario for our customers isn't "broken cluster" — it's "missing this week's optimization." The work you were already doing keeps going.
Security

The data we take.
And the data we never touch.

Before security review asks: here's the full list. Metadata and resource shape — enough to do the work. Nothing about your application, your users, or your code.

we collect — the minimum to do the work

Cluster shape and resource signals

  • cluster name · region · Kubernetes version
  • node specs · instance types · capacity
  • workload metadata · labels · annotations
  • resource requests · usage · GC metrics

we never collect — nothing about your app

Nothing your application owns

  • application data or request payloads
  • secrets · configmaps content
  • logs · stdout · stderr · stack traces
  • network traffic between pods
TLS 1.3 encrypted in transit Private per-cluster API key SOC 2 Type II · audited annually Full data collection doc →
Onboarding

See the waste in 5 minutes.
Decide when to act.

Install in two steps. Phase 1 is read-only — we analyze, nothing changes. Phase 2 grants scoped, least-privilege execution — only when you say so.

CloudPilot AI
CloudPilot AI Server
SaaS control plane
Your clusterAWSAzureGCPK8s
Phase 1 · DetectRead-only
Sync data
Agent
Phase 2 · ExecuteLeast privilege
Operation sync
Controller
Reschedule
Workloads
Create / Delete / Drain
EC2 / GCE / Azure VM
DeploymentThe diagram shows our SaaS cloud architecture. Self-hosted (fully in-cluster) deployment is also available depending on your requirements — book a demo to discuss private deployment.
Pricing

The only product that doesn't need extra budget.

Start with a free proof of concept — see your exact waste in Phase 1 at no cost. You only ever pay a share of the savings we actually deliver.

Free POCPhase 1 is free, forever. Run a full read-only analysis and get your exact savings number before committing a cent. No credit card, no cluster changes.
Pricing model

Price per vCPU

$8.8

per core per month

Simple, transparent pricing
Up to 67% of total savings
Pricing sample

Savings

42%

Saving monthly

$150K
vCPU
10,0005,800after
Cost
$350K$200Kafter

We charge ~30% of savings

5,800×$8.8=$51,040

Running 10k+ cores or need self-hosted / regulated deployment? Book a demo for volume pricing, SLAs, and on-prem.

Get your free savings report.
No credit card. No code change.

Read-only access5 minutes to installZero code changeZero pod restarts